Skip to content
Theorem·T04

Equivalence classes form a partition

An equivalence relation slices its set into disjoint classes covering it.

For every equivalence relation on a set , the quotient is a partition of ; moreover, for all :
In words
For every equivalence relation R on a set A, the quotient is a partition of A: the classes are non-empty, pairwise disjoint, and together cover A. Moreover, for any elements a and b, the class of a equals the class of b exactly when a is related to b.
Never needed: F05 · F06 · F08 · F10 · F11 · F12 · F13 · A02 · A03 · A04 · A05 · A06 · A07 · A08 (computed from the citation graph, not asserted).

Proof

  1. 1
    No class is empty. For , reflexivity of gives , so by D021. Hence , since every member of the quotient is of the form .
  2. 2
    The classes cover . Each is a subset of , so (D004, D001). Conversely each lies in by step 1, so . By Extensionality, .
  3. 3
    If then . Let , i.e. . From and transitivity, , so : thus . By symmetry of , also holds, and the same argument gives . Extensionality concludes .
  4. 4
    If then . By step 1, , and membership in means precisely (D021, substitutivity).
  5. 5
    Distinct classes are disjoint. Suppose , say lies in both (D008). Then and ; symmetry gives , and transitivity . By step 3, . Contrapositively (negation), distinct classes have empty intersection. Together with steps 1 and 2, satisfies all three clauses of D023.

Remarks

The fundamental theorem of equivalence relations. It has a converse: given a partition of , declaring when and share a piece defines an equivalence relation whose classes are exactly the pieces of ; so equivalence relations and partitions are the same structure in two presentations. This theorem is the engine of every quotient construction, and its finite counting consequence (L27) is what makes Lagrange's theorem work.

Used by