Skip to content
Theorem·T09

The well-ordering principle

Every non-empty set of naturals has a smallest member.

For every : and this least element is . Order from D029.
In words
For any set S of natural numbers: if S is not empty then there is some m that belongs to S and is at most every member of S. This least element is unique.
Never needed: F05 · F10 · F13 · A02 · A03 · A04 · A05 · A07 (computed from the citation graph, not asserted).

Proof

  1. 1
    We prove the contrapositive: if has no least element, then .
  2. 2
    Let (Separation). We verify the hypothesis of strong induction for : let and suppose every lies in , i.e. no belongs to .
  3. 3
    If belonged to , it would be a least element of : for any , L16 compares with ; the case is excluded (such are not in ), so or , i.e. (symmetry, D029). This contradicts the assumption that has no least element (negation). Hence , that is, .
  4. 4
    T08 gives . Since and every natural is outside , no member of exists: by Extensionality with D002. Contraposing (F04, excluded middle): a non-empty has a least element.
  5. 5
    Uniqueness: if and are both least, then (as ) and (as ). If , both inequalities are strict, giving and , which L16 forbids. So .

Remarks

The well-ordering principle is the third face of induction: ordinary induction, strong induction and well-ordering are all equivalent over the naturals. It grounds every "take the least counterexample" argument, also known as infinite descent: if counterexamples existed, a least one would, and deriving a smaller one is then a contradiction. The division algorithm and prime divisor existence can both be run this way. The property is special: the integers, rationals and reals all fail it, which is why induction is a phenomenon of .

Used by